煤炭工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3): 189-196.doi: 10. 11799/ ce202503025

• 研究探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同粉煤灰固碳降碱性能对比实验研究

赵鹤鸣,陈清通,刘志飞,等   

  1. 1. 煤炭科学研究总院,北京 100013

    2. 煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 100013

    3. 煤矿灾害防控全国重点实验室,北京 100013

    4. 北京市煤矿安全工程技术研究中心,北京 100013

  • 收稿日期:2024-09-12 修回日期:2024-12-31 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈清通 E-mail:cqt4595@126.com

Comparative experimental study on carbon fixation and alkalinity reduction of different fly ashes

  • Received:2024-09-12 Revised:2024-12-31 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-05-15

摘要:

为对比分析粉煤灰性质对矿化CO2能力的影响,以煤粉炉粉煤灰和循环流化床粉煤灰作为研究对象,开展不同温度压力条件下粉煤灰浆液固碳降碱实验。测定粉煤灰矿化CO2过程中的浆液pH变化,并采用X射线衍射(XRD)、扫描电镜(SEM)、离子色谱测试、同步热分析等测试手段,对反应前后物化性质差异、固碳能力等方面进行分析。结果表明:相同条件下,循环流化床粉煤灰相较于煤粉炉粉煤灰具有更高的降碱效率;在75min的反应时间内,循环流化床粉煤灰浆液pH值能够降至7以下,而煤粉炉粉煤灰则需要约175min的反应时间才能达到相同效果;钙赋存形式的不同决定了两种粉煤灰钙离子浸出速率的差异,流化床粉煤灰中钙主要为CaO,且其疏松多孔的形貌更利于钙离子浸出,煤粉炉粉煤灰中钙主要为硅酸三钙,其凝珠状态的球形外壳限制了钙离子释放;在0.2MPa和25℃条件下,循环流化床和煤粉炉粉煤灰的固碳能力可分别为39.6和78.2gCO2/kg粉煤灰。

关键词:

粉煤灰 , CO2矿化 , 固碳性能 , 固废利用

Abstract:

To compare and analyze the impact of fly ash properties on the differences in carbonation capacity, coal-fired power plant fly ash and circulating fluidized bed fly ash were studied as research subjects. Experiments on carbon sequestration and alkalinity reduction in fly ash slurry under different temperature and pressure conditions were conducted, and the pH changes in the slurry during the mineralization of CO2 by fly ash were measured. Analytical methods such as X-ray diffraction(XRD), scanning electron microscopy(SEM), ion chromatography, and simultaneous thermal analysis were used to study the differences in physical and chemical properties before and after the reaction, as well as the carbon fixation capacity. The research results indicate: (Ⅰ) Under the same conditions, CFB fly ash exhibits a higher alkalinity reduction efficiency compared to coal-fired power plant fly ash. Within a reaction time of 75 minutes, the pH of CFB fly ash slurry can be reduced to below 7, while coal-fired power plant fly ash requires approximately 175 minutes of reaction time to achieve the same pH reduction effect. (Ⅱ) The different forms of calcium content determine the differences in the leaching rate of calcium ions between the two types of fly ash. In CFB fly ash, calcium mainly exists in the form of CaO, and its loose and porous morphological characteristics are more conducive to the leaching of calcium ions. In contrast, in coal-fired power plant fly ash, calcium mainly exists in the form of tricalcium silicate, where the spherical shell in a glassy state limits the release of calcium ions. (Ⅲ) Under conditions of 0.2 MPa and 25 ℃, CFB fly ash can achieve carbon fixation of 39.6 gCO2/kg of fly ash, while pulverized coal furnace fly ash can achieve carbon fixation of 78.2 gCO2/kg of fly ash.

中图分类号: