煤炭工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 128-132.doi: 10.11799/ce202101027

• 研究探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

城郊煤矿二水平煤层底板突水危险性综合评价研究

段李宏1,张金陵2   

  1. 1. 河南煤业化工集团永煤公司地测处
    2. 河南煤业化工集团永煤公司
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-05 修回日期:2020-03-31 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-04-27
  • 通讯作者: 段李宏 E-mail:dlhcumt@163.com

Study on the Risk Assessment of Water Inrush from the Floor of the Second Level Coal Seam in Chengjiao Coal Mine

  • Received:2019-11-05 Revised:2020-03-31 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-04-27

摘要: 为了探究城郊煤矿深部延伸二水平主采二2煤层底板突水危险性,根据矿区二水平底板地层及断层构造特征,采用突水系数法和分形分维方法对二水平底板的断层构造复杂程度及突水危险性分别进行了量化分区与综合分区评价。结果表明,虽然两种方法的计算过程和量化分区参数不同,但所进行的量化分区具有较好的一致性,断裂构造复杂程度分维值与突水系数值存在明显的正相关性,断裂构造复杂区域对应的突水系数值明显偏大,综合对比得到二水平煤层底板在东部和西部突水危险性均较大,中间区域偏安全。研究结果对城郊煤矿二水平二2煤层安全带压开采具有重要的参考价值。

关键词: 城郊煤矿, 底板突水, 突水危险性, 断层, 分形分维, 突水系数

Abstract: Abstract:In order to explore the risk of water inrush from the bottom of the two-level main mining 2nd coal seam in the deep extension of the suburban coal mine, according to the characteristics of the two horizontal floor strata and fault structure in the mining area, the fault structure complexity of the two horizontal floor is adopted by the water inrush coefficient method and the fractal dimension method. The risk of water inrush was quantified and integrated. The results show that although the calculation process and the quantitative partitioning parameters of the two methods are different, the quantitative partitioning performed has good consistency, and the fractal dimension of the fracture structure has a significant positive correlation with the water inrush coefficient value, and the fault structure is complex. The value of the water inrush coefficient corresponding to the area is obviously too large. The comprehensive comparison shows that the water level of the two horizontal coal seams is larger in the east and west, and the middle area is safer. The research results have important reference value for the safety belt pressure mining of the second level and the second coal seam in Chengjiao Coal Mine.