坚硬厚顶板煤柱型冲击地压防治技术研究#br#

	#br#

doi:10.11799/ce202203019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了对坚硬厚顶板这种特定地质条件下的冲击地压防治技术进一步细化研究，分析了宽沟煤矿I010203工作面开采过程中上覆坚硬厚顶板冲击地压过程，提出了相应的防冲技术措施，并基于工作面卸压防冲前后微震事件时空变化规律对防治技术进行了效果检验，研究结果表明：B2煤层开采后上覆坚硬厚顶板易在I010203工作面采空区及相邻I010201采空区之间的煤柱区域产生悬顶，不但会造成煤体静载应力集中，而且造成能量积聚，从而产生大量动载，悬顶长度过长时会发生垮落、破断等强动载扰动，当动载荷和静载荷叠加超过临界值时便会造成冲击显现，煤柱集中静载和坚硬顶板破断动载是冲击地压主控因素。根据上述冲击地压分析结果，设计了顶板断顶预裂和煤体超前爆破两种卸压技术措施，并选取卸压前后稳定生产期间的微震事件进行卸压效果对比分析，卸压后微震日总能量和日总频次明显降低，103～104J以上微震事件明显减少且微震的空间分布较为分散，顶板附近微震事件明显减少，说明采取的卸压措施效果明显，可有效降低冲击危险性。

关键词: 坚硬厚顶板, 冲击地压, 顶板卸压, 煤体卸压, 微震事件

Abstract: In this paper, to further study the rock burst prevention technology under the specific geological conditions of hard-thick roof strata, the rock burst process of the overlying hard-thick roof strata in the mining process of I010203 working face of a mine was analyzed, the corresponding technical measures were put forward, and the effect of the prevention technology based on the temporal and spatial variation law of ME events before and after the pressure relief and erosion prevention of the working face was tested. The results show as follows: after the mining of B2 coal seam, the overlying hard-thick roof strata was easy to produce hanging roof in the goaf of I010203 working face and the coal pillar area between the I010201 goaf. This part of hanging roof would not only cause the static load stress concentration of coal body, but also cause energy accumulation, resulting in a lot of dynamic load. When the length of hanging roof was too long, strong dynamic load disturbance such as caving and breaking would occur, when the superposition of dynamic load and static load exceeded the critical value, rock burst would occur. The concentrated static load of coal pillar and the dynamic load of hard roof strata breaking were the main controlling factors of rock burst. According to the above analysis results of rock burst, two kinds of pressure relief technical measures (roof breaking pre splitting and advance coal blasting) were designed. The ME events during stable production period before and after pressure relief were selected for comparative analysis of pressure relief effect. It is found that after pressure relief, the daily total energy and frequency of ME events are significantly reduced, and the ME events above 103-104J are significantly reduced, and the spatial distribution of ME events is relatively scattered. The ME events near the roof are significantly reduced, which indicates that the pressure relief measures can effectively reduce the rock burst hazard. The research results can provide a reference for the formulation of pressure relief technical measures of hard-thick roof strata in coal mine.

中图分类号:

TD324

孙秉成, 兰世瑞, 张传玖, 李振雷, 李红平, 杨旭, 贾兵兵. 坚硬厚顶板煤柱型冲击地压防治技术研究#br#

#br#

[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(3): 99-104.

参考文献

[1]姜耀东, 赵毅鑫.我国煤矿冲击地压的研究现状:机制、预警与控制[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(11):2188-2204
[2]Zhao T, Guo W, Tan Y, et al.Case studies of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions during multi-seam mining at a depth of 800m[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(3):1539-1564
[3]Zheng J, Ju W, Sun X, et al.Analysis of Hydro-fracturing Technique Using Ultra-deep Boreholes for Coal Mining with Hard Roofs: a Case Study[J].Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2020, 38(1):1-14
[4]潘俊锋, 毛德兵, 蓝航, 等.我国煤矿冲击地压防治技术研究现状及展望[J].煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(6):21-25
[5]He X, Chen W, Nie B, et al.Electromagnetic emission theory and its application to dynamic phenomena in coal-rock[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(8):1352-1358
[6]李振雷, 窦林名, 王桂峰, 等.坚硬顶板孤岛煤柱工作面冲击特征及机制分析[J].采矿与安全工程学报, 2014, 31(04):519-524
[7]Tan Y, Yin Y, Gu S, et al.Multi-index monitoring and evaluation on rock burst in Yangcheng Mine[J].Shock and Vibration, 2015, 12(4):624-628
[8]潘一山.煤矿冲击地压扰动响应失稳理论及应用[J].煤炭学报, 2018, 43(8):2091-2098
[9]李新华, 张向东.浅埋煤层坚硬直接顶破断诱发冲击地压机理及防治[J].煤炭学报, 2017, 42(2):510-517
[10]吕进国, 姜耀东, 李守国, 等.巨厚坚硬顶板条件下断层诱冲特征及机制[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 39(10):1961-1969
[11]Liu D, Ren Z, Long Z, et al.Mining Design Pattern Use Scenarios and Related Design Pattern Pairs: A Case Study on Online Posts[J].Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2020, 35(5):963-978
[12]Tian J, Wu Q, Liu Z.Numerical Simulation of the Relationship between the Width of Destressed Zone and Blasthole Depth[J].Engineering, 2020, 12(04):269-279
[13]沈荣喜, 王恩元, 刘贞堂, 等.近距离下保护层开采防冲机理及技术研究[J].煤炭学报, 2011, 36(S1):63-67
[14]Guo W, Tan Y, Yang Z, et al.Effect of saturation time on the bursting liability indexes of coal and its application for rockburst mitigation[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2018, 36(1):589-597
[15]杨俊哲, 郑凯歌, 王振荣, 等.坚硬顶板动力灾害超前弱化治理技术[J].煤炭学报, 2020, 45(10):3371-3379
[16]窦林名, 李振雷, 何学秋.厚煤层综放开采的降载减冲原理及其应用研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(2):221-230
[17]杨俊哲, 郑凯歌.厚煤层综放开采覆岩动力灾害原理及防治技术[J].采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(4):750-758

坚硬厚顶板煤柱型冲击地压防治技术研究#br#
#br#

Control of rock burst induced by coal pillar and hard-thick roof strata

PDF (Mobile)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	庞立宁. 基于层次分析法的顶板卸压技术方案优选[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(6): 90-94.
[2]	秦喜文, 牟亮, 韩刚, 吕玉磊. 双回撤通道冲击地压防治技术研究与应用[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(3): 73-78.
[3]	刘旭东, 刘传义, 刘垚, 张燊. 近直立煤层深浅孔爆破卸压技术与效果分析[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(3): 79-83.
[4]	张金魁, 侯涛, 李民, 李鹏, 顾合龙. 动力扰动诱发煤层大巷冲击地压机理及其防控技术[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(2): 62-66.
[5]	张修峰, 孔令海. 鄂尔多斯深部典型煤矿冲击地压发生机制与防治实践[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(2): 93-97.
[6]	张传玖, 薛雅荣, 杨伟, 李振雷, 李红平, 杨旭, 贾兵兵. 浅埋深坚硬顶板工作面冲击地压微震时空前兆信息特征[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(2): 98-104.
[7]	陈星, 冯美华, 尚楠, 秦子晗. 厚硬顶板宽煤柱临空巷道冲击地压防治技术研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2022, 54(1): 84-88.
[8]	苏波. 浅埋深工作面端头悬顶定向水力压裂卸压技术应用[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(5): 80-84.
[9]	李绍良, 张磊, 张毅. 煤柱影响下开切眼掘进冲击地压防治技术研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(5): 85-89.
[10]	王成龙, 陈一方, 王成乐. 冲击地压薄壁圆管吸能构件仿真与试验研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(5): 142-147.
[11]	刘毅涛, 王颜亮, 曲效成, 刘文涛, 魏全德, 董亚东, 张松林, 韩亮. 乌审旗典型工作面停复采冲击危险性分析与防治#br# #br# [J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(4): 66-70.
[12]	常博, 王建, 李康, 闫瑞兵. 乌东煤矿近直立煤层不同卸压方案效果对比研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(2): 80-84.
[13]	张明鹏, 曹连民, 李鹏, 杨朋威. 冲击地压风险智能监控预警平台研究与应用[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(2): 137-140.
[14]	巴图金·安德里安·谢尔盖耶维奇, 王志强. 能源开发条件下的强烈地质动力现象特性[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(1): 1-6.
[15]	孙立田, 孔贺, 张立明, 田国庆, 李登月. 多因素应力叠加冲击危险性评价应力增量取值实测分析[J]. 煤炭工程, 2020, 52(9): 94-98.