煤炭工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 49-56.doi: 10.11799/ce202401008

• 施工技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

大柳塔52606工作面沿空留巷围岩走向非均匀破坏机制研究

迟国铭,周海丰,李刚,等   

  1. 1. 神华神东布尔台煤矿
    2. 神华神东煤炭集团公司
    3. 辽宁工程技术大学
    4. 国能神东煤炭技术研究院
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-05 修回日期:2023-11-22 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-01-29
  • 通讯作者: 李刚 E-mail:13904985246@163.com

Study on non-uniform failure mechanism of surrounding rock along goaf retaining roadway at Daliuta 52606 working face

  • Received:2023-07-05 Revised:2023-11-22 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-01-29

摘要: 大柳塔煤矿沿空留巷工作面混凝土墙及煤柱受力变形与煤层埋深呈现明显相关性,为获取埋深影响留巷侧围岩非均匀破坏的机制,以52606工作面开采为背景,采用相似材料模拟实验和理论分析的方法对岩层垮落结构及应力分布规律进行研究。结果表明,埋深增加,对应的周期来压步由10 m逐渐增加至约20 m。支承压力应力升高区范围增加,应力集中系数增加,应力峰值位置距离工作面距离减少。工作面顶板裂隙密度增加,不利于在埋深大区域形成支撑结构,不利于留巷稳定。埋深较大的终采线侧垮落角为34°,埋深较小的开切眼侧垮落角为43°。垮落角减小悬臂结构长度增加,破碎围岩支撑力减弱导致埋深大区域巷道发生大变形。

关键词: 沿空留巷, 埋深, 相似模拟, 覆岩裂隙

Abstract: The stress of the concrete wall and coal pillar along the roadway is closely related to the structure formed by the collapse of the rock layer above. In order to obtain the caving structure and fracture evolution law of overlying rock on the goal-retaining working face of Daliuta coal mine, the study on the overlying rock structure and fracture evolution law of 52606 working face of Daliuta coal mine was carried out by using the method of similar material simulation experiment and theoretical analysis, and the influence of the change of buried depth from the cutting hole side to the stopping line side on the ore pressure development of 52606 working face was revealed. The influence mechanism of buried depth on mine pressure and surrounding rock along goaf is put forward. The results show that after the mining of the 52606 face, the burial depth gradually increases from the cutting hole to the stop-mining face, and the corresponding period of pressing step increases. The period of pressing step is 10m when the depth near the cutting hole is shallow, and the period of pressing step increases to about 20m with the increase of burying depth. At the same time, the corresponding caving Angle is obviously different. The caving Angle on the side of the stop-mining line with larger buried depth is 34°, and the caving Angle on the side of the cut hole with smaller buried depth is 43°. In the process of advancing the working face from a small buried depth to a large buried depth area, the range of abutment pressure stress increase, the stress concentration coefficient increases, the distance from the peak stress position to the working face decreases, and the crack density of the working face roof increases, which is not conducive to the formation of support structures in the large buried depth area and is not conducive to the stability of lane retention. The above analysis is consistent with the field observation.